Benjamin Mitchell vs Sebastian Fanselow Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mitchell vs Fanselow analysis and find out who is favored!
Benjamin Mitchell vs Sebastian Fanselow Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mitchell 2 - 0 Fanselow
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mitchell has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Fanselow has won 49.81%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mitchell, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fanselow has won 50.97%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 30.44% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mitchell has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fanselow has saved 60.94% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mitchell has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Fanselow winning 61.36% (W/L 54/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mitchell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 216/ 124), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Fanselow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 204/ 118), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 33/ 30).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Mitchell winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Mitchell winning 4 and Fanselow winning 1. The last match between Mitchell and Fanselow was at the Launceston Challenger, 03-02-2018, Q1 round, Hard with Benjamin Mitchell getting the victory 6-3 3-6 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:56:26.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mitchell and Fanselow have played a deciding set 1 times, with Mitchell winning 1 times and Fanselow 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mitchell winning 0, and Fanselow 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mitchell has played against opponents with an average rank of while Fanselow has played against players with an average rank of 233.61.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mitchell has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fanselow has won 62% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mitchell has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fanselow has converted 34.36% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mitchell 2 - 0 Fanselow
10
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
9
Minor
Ret.
Rank
204
High
31
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
298
Rank
273
High
32
Age
R
Plays
12
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
12
Minor
Form
61% (263-171)
Career Total W/L
60% (355-232)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
51% (18-17)
$34,430
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Benjamin Mitchell | Sebastian Fanselow |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
Games Won | 28 | 19 |
Aces (Total) | 6 | 5 |
DFs (Total) | 5 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 0:56:26 | 0:56:26 |
1st Serve % | 76% (66/87) | 68% (61/90) |
1st Serve Win% | 70% (46/66) | 66% (40/61) |
2nd Serve Win% | 52% (11/21) | 52% (15/29) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 50% (3/6) |
Return Points W% | 39% (35/90) | 34% (30/87) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 3-6 7-5 |
Benjamin Mitchell
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
76%
(
66 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
61 of
90)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
6-1 6-4 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Benjamin Mitchell | Sebastian Fanselow |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 51% (18/17) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 49% (39/41) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 49% (393/401) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 47% (7/8) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 62% (8/5) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.38 |
Aces Total | 0 | 148 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.26 |
DFs Total | 0 | 100 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:46:28 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 242.29 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 58% (1390/2393) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (978/1390) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (498/1003) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 35% (88/248) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (954/2489) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 46% (11/13) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/3) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (17/34) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 44% (7/16) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 64% (7/11) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 94% (16/15) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 6% (16/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 16% (19/3) |
Benjamin Mitchell Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Vincent Stouff
Player
Benjamin Mitchell
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve %
53%
(
17 of
32)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
32
Total Points Won
22
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Benjamin Mitchell
Player
Aaron Addison
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Benjamin Mitchell
Player
Issei Okamura
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF | w/o | H2H | |||
R1 |
Benjamin Mitchell
Player
Edward Bourchier
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF | w/o | H2H | |||
R2 |
Benjamin Mitchell
Player
Nicholas S. Hu
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
92)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Benjamin Mitchell
Player
Nathan Eshmade
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
SF |
Luke Saville
Player
Benjamin Mitchell
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Benjamin Mitchell
Player
Dayne Kelly
75%
(
55 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Sebastian Fanselow Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Taro Daniel
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
92)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Lucas Gerch
54%
(
47 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
48%
(
42 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Otto Virtanen
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Luca Castagnola
43%
(
41 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
9
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Maxime Cressy
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
15
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
Jakub Nicod
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
8 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more